The new movie Oppenheimer spends three hours tracking the rise and fall of the inventor of the A-bomb; no doubt you have heard of this opus, which is so good that it even comes close to the ratings of Barbie. What is most … Continue reading
Category Archives: AI
All the above are famous writers. The first two have copyright protection. Writers can copyright their works. What protection does a human writer have who claims protection against copying when a text is generated by GAI on instruction from that … Continue reading
AI has a significant role, and a growing role, in healthcare. AI can apply massive date to improve diagnosis, treatment program design, drug development and robotic surgery. Medical literature doubles every seven years, promising massive updated data to be processed … Continue reading
The obvious first issues that the SEC should be concerned about, as GAI advances, are that businesses do not lie about either their use of AI or how they protect themselves from being harmed by third party GAI. In fact, … Continue reading
Current press coverage is full of articles and columns extolling the advantages of AI in business. These articles form a counterpoint to the scare risk scenarios which grabbed the early headlines. The gist is that at least in its current … Continue reading
Notwithstanding the call for slowing down GAI until controls can be applied, businesses are charging ahead, according to today’s NYTimes. (I hate to say it, but per my immediately prior post, was the writer correct that the drive for profit … Continue reading
You need to bear with me on this long post; skip it if you are not interested in a completely different analysis of GAI risk. It has been a couple of weeks since I posted on GAI, during which time … Continue reading
As previously posted, the EU has been entertaining legislation of wide scope to control AI in numerous ways; this past Wednesday they enacted the first part of their proposed regulatory scheme. Seems only China is ahead of the EU, and … Continue reading
No one knows if AI will destroy more jobs than it creates, render less educated or less intelligent people unemployed, drive innovation that creates new classes of jobs, or ends up creating wealth so vast that supporting the unemployed will … Continue reading
First, you know a novel topic has been extensively rehashed when the Sunday New York Times does a summary “think piece” about prior commentary (yesterday). Could it be that generative AI, red hot for a few weeks, has become not … Continue reading